+ The "Need for Speed" release.
+
+ The timings done to validate the 3.3.2 were faulty.
+ Instead of being 5% faster, it was 15% slower (compared to 3.3.1).
+
+ The problem was a conversion from a manually handled vector to
+ xbt_dynar_t on the critical path.
+ xbt_dynar_foreach calls functions, inducing stack management crap.
+
+ We inlined these functions and xbt_dynar_foreach is now breath taking.
+ We also inlined xbt_swag_belong on the way.
+
+ Here are some approximate speedup measurements (on master/slaves
+ simulations lasting between 10s and 20s each):
+ 3.3.1 -> 3.3.2: -15%
+ 3.3.2 -> 3.3.3: +40%
+ 3.3.1 -> 3.3.3: +40%
+ 3.3.1 with inline patch -> 3.3.3: +30%
+
+ Our reading is that the refactoring which occurred in 3.3.2 made us
+ suffer much more from the xbt_dynar_foreach low performance, but
+ once we solved this, this refactoring proved to be very performance
+ effective.
+
+ That's a pitty that gcc cannot inline functions placed in other files
+ alone. We have to choose between:
+ - break the encapsulation (by putting private data structures and
+ accessors in headers files to help gcc)
+ - live with low performance
+ - switch to a decent compiler such as icc (not quite possible).