Implement network-nonlinear using python bindings.
Add bindings support for many methods (Link, NetZone, etc), hovewer not fully covered.
include examples/python/exec-dvfs/exec-dvfs.tesh
include examples/python/exec-remote/exec-remote.py
include examples/python/exec-remote/exec-remote.tesh
+include examples/python/network-nonlinear/network-nonlinear.py
+include examples/python/network-nonlinear/network-nonlinear.tesh
include examples/smpi/NAS/DGraph.c
include examples/smpi/NAS/DGraph.h
include examples/smpi/NAS/README.install
foreach(example actor-create actor-daemon actor-join actor-kill actor-migrate actor-suspend actor-yield actor-lifetime
comm-wait comm-waitall comm-waitany
- exec-async exec-basic exec-dvfs exec-remote)
+ exec-async exec-basic exec-dvfs exec-remote
+ network-nonlinear)
set(tesh_files ${tesh_files} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/${example}/${example}.tesh)
set(examples_src ${examples_src} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/${example}/${example}.py)
--- /dev/null
+# Copyright (c) 2006-2021. The SimGrid Team. All rights reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+# under the terms of the license (GNU LGPL) which comes with this package.
+
+# This example shows how to simulate a non-linear resource sharing for
+# network links.
+
+from simgrid import Actor, Engine, Comm, Mailbox, NetZone, Link, LinkInRoute, this_actor
+import sys
+import functools
+
+class Sender:
+ """
+ Send a series of messages to mailbox "receiver"
+ """
+ def __init__(self, msg_count, msg_size=int(1e6)):
+ self.msg_count = msg_count
+ self.msg_size = msg_size
+
+ # Actors that are created as object will execute their __call__ method.
+ # So, the following constitutes the main function of the Sender actor.
+ def __call__(self):
+ pending_comms = []
+ mbox = Mailbox.by_name("receiver")
+
+ for i in range(self.msg_count):
+ msg = "Message " + str(i)
+ size = self.msg_size * (i + 1)
+ this_actor.info("Send '%s' to '%s, msg size: %d'" % (msg, mbox.name, size))
+ comm = mbox.put_async(msg, size)
+ pending_comms.append(comm)
+
+ this_actor.info("Done dispatching all messages")
+
+ # Now that all message exchanges were initiated, wait for their completion in one single call
+ Comm.wait_all(pending_comms)
+
+ this_actor.info("Goodbye now!")
+
+class Receiver:
+ """
+ Receiver actor: wait for N messages on the mailbox "receiver"
+ """
+
+ def __init__(self, msg_count=10):
+ self.msg_count = msg_count
+
+ def __call__(self):
+ mbox = Mailbox.by_name("receiver")
+
+ pending_msgs = []
+ pending_comms = []
+
+ this_actor.info("Wait for %d messages asynchronously" % self.msg_count)
+ for i in range(self.msg_count):
+ comm, data = mbox.get_async()
+ pending_comms.append(comm)
+ pending_msgs.append(data)
+
+ while len(pending_comms) > 0:
+ index = Comm.wait_any(pending_comms)
+ msg = pending_msgs[index].get()
+ this_actor.info("I got '%s'." % msg)
+ del pending_comms[index]
+ del pending_msgs[index]
+
+####################################################################################################
+def link_nonlinear(link, capacity, n):
+ """
+ Non-linear resource sharing for links
+
+ Note that the callback is called twice in this example:
+ 1) link UP: with the number of active flows (from 9 to 1)
+ 2) link DOWN: with 0 active flows. A crosstraffic communication is happing
+ in the down link, but it's not considered as an active flow.
+ """
+ # emulates a degradation in link according to the number of flows
+ # you probably want something more complex than that and based on real
+ # experiments
+ capacity = min(capacity, capacity * (1.0 - (n - 1) / 10.0))
+ this_actor.info("Link %s, %d active communications, new capacity %f" % (link.name, n, capacity))
+ return capacity
+
+def load_platform():
+ """
+ Create a simple 2-hosts platform */
+ ________ __________
+ | Sender |===============| Receiver |
+ |________| Link1 |__________|
+
+ """
+ zone = NetZone.create_full_zone("Zone1")
+ sender = zone.create_host("sender", 1).seal()
+ receiver = zone.create_host("receiver", 1).seal()
+
+ link = zone.create_split_duplex_link("link1", 1e6)
+ # setting same callbacks (could be different) for link UP/DOWN in split-duplex link
+ link.get_link_up().set_sharing_policy(
+ Link.SharingPolicy.NONLINEAR,
+ functools.partial(link_nonlinear, link.get_link_up()))
+ link.get_link_down().set_sharing_policy(
+ Link.SharingPolicy.NONLINEAR,
+ functools.partial(link_nonlinear, link.get_link_down()))
+ link.set_latency(10e-6).seal()
+
+ # create routes between nodes
+ zone.add_route(sender.get_netpoint(), receiver.get_netpoint(), None, None,
+ [LinkInRoute(link, LinkInRoute.Direction.UP)], True)
+ zone.seal()
+
+ # create actors Sender/Receiver
+ Actor.create("receiver", receiver, Receiver(9))
+ Actor.create("sender", sender, Sender(9))
+
+###################################################################################################
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ e = Engine(sys.argv)
+
+ # create platform
+ load_platform()
+
+ # runs the simulation
+ e.run()
+
+ # explicitly deleting Engine object to avoid segfault during cleanup phase.
+ # During Engine destruction, the cleanup of std::function linked to link_non_linear callback is called.
+ # If we let the cleanup by itself, it fails trying on its destruction because the python main program
+ # has already freed its variables
+ del(e)
--- /dev/null
+$ ${pythoncmd:=python3} ${PYTHON_TOOL_OPTIONS:=} ${srcdir:=.}/network-nonlinear.py "--log=root.fmt:[%10.6r]%e(%i:%a@%h)%e%m%n"
+>[ 0.000000] (1:receiver@receiver) Wait for 9 messages asynchronously
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 0' to 'receiver, msg size: 1000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 1' to 'receiver, msg size: 2000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 2' to 'receiver, msg size: 3000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 3' to 'receiver, msg size: 4000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 4' to 'receiver, msg size: 5000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 5' to 'receiver, msg size: 6000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 6' to 'receiver, msg size: 7000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 7' to 'receiver, msg size: 8000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Send 'Message 8' to 'receiver, msg size: 9000000'
+>[ 0.000000] (2:sender@sender) Done dispatching all messages
+>[ 0.000000] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[ 0.000000] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[ 0.000130] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 9 active communications, new capacity 200000.000000
+>[ 0.000130] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[ 46.391883] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 0'.
+>[ 46.391883] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 8 active communications, new capacity 300000.000000
+>[ 46.391883] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[ 73.883292] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 1'.
+>[ 73.883292] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 7 active communications, new capacity 400000.000000
+>[ 73.883292] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[ 91.924529] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 2'.
+>[ 91.924529] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 6 active communications, new capacity 500000.000000
+>[ 91.924529] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[104.295663] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 3'.
+>[104.295663] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 5 active communications, new capacity 600000.000000
+>[104.295663] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[112.886728] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 4'.
+>[112.886728] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 4 active communications, new capacity 700000.000000
+>[112.886728] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[118.777744] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 5'.
+>[118.777744] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 3 active communications, new capacity 800000.000000
+>[118.777744] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[122.643724] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 6'.
+>[122.643724] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 2 active communications, new capacity 900000.000000
+>[122.643724] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[124.934674] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 7'.
+>[124.934674] (0:maestro@) Link link1_UP, 1 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[124.934674] (0:maestro@) Link link1_DOWN, 0 active communications, new capacity 1000000.000000
+>[125.965602] (1:receiver@receiver) I got 'Message 8'.
+>[125.965602] (2:sender@sender) Goodbye now!
#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
#endif
+#include "simgrid/kernel/routing/NetPoint.hpp"
#include "src/kernel/context/Context.hpp"
#include <simgrid/Exception.hpp>
#include <simgrid/s4u/Actor.hpp>
#include <simgrid/s4u/Engine.hpp>
#include <simgrid/s4u/Exec.hpp>
#include <simgrid/s4u/Host.hpp>
+#include <simgrid/s4u/Link.hpp>
#include <simgrid/s4u/Mailbox.hpp>
+#include <simgrid/s4u/NetZone.hpp>
#include <simgrid/version.h>
#include <algorithm>
return simgrid::xbt::string_printf("%i.%i.%i", major, minor, patch);
}
+/** @brief Wrap for mailbox::get_async */
+class PyGetAsync {
+ std::unique_ptr<PyObject*> data = std::make_unique<PyObject*>();
+
+public:
+ PyObject** get() const { return data.get(); }
+};
+
/* Classes GilScopedAcquire and GilScopedRelease have the same purpose as pybind11::gil_scoped_acquire and
* pybind11::gil_scoped_release. Refer to the manual of pybind11 for details:
* https://pybind11.readthedocs.io/en/stable/advanced/misc.html#global-interpreter-lock-gil
},
"Registers the main function of an actor");
+ /* Class Netzone */
+ py::class_<simgrid::s4u::NetZone, std::unique_ptr<simgrid::s4u::NetZone, py::nodelete>>(m, "NetZone",
+ "Networking Zones")
+ .def_static("create_full_zone", &simgrid::s4u::create_full_zone, "Creates a netzone of type FullZone")
+ .def("add_route",
+ py::overload_cast<simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint*, simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint*,
+ simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint*, simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint*,
+ const std::vector<simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute>&, bool>(&simgrid::s4u::NetZone::add_route),
+ "Add a route between 2 netpoints")
+ .def("create_host", py::overload_cast<const std::string&, double>(&simgrid::s4u::NetZone::create_host),
+ "Creates a host")
+ .def("create_split_duplex_link",
+ py::overload_cast<const std::string&, double>(&simgrid::s4u::NetZone::create_split_duplex_link),
+ "Creates a split-duplex link")
+ .def("seal", &simgrid::s4u::NetZone::seal, "Seal this NetZone");
+
/* Class Host */
py::class_<simgrid::s4u::Host, std::unique_ptr<Host, py::nodelete>>(m, "Host", "Simulated host")
.def("by_name", &Host::by_name, "Retrieves a host from its name, or die")
.def("get_pstate_count", &Host::get_pstate_count, "Retrieve the count of defined pstate levels")
.def("get_pstate_speed", &Host::get_pstate_speed, "Retrieve the maximal speed at the given pstate")
+ .def("get_netpoint", &Host::get_netpoint, "Retrieve the netpoint associated to this host")
+ .def("seal", &Host::seal, "Seal this host")
.def_property(
"pstate", &Host::get_pstate,
[](Host* h, int i) {
"The peak computing speed in flops/s at the current pstate, taking the external load into account. "
"This is the max potential speed.");
+ /* Class NetPoint */
+ py::class_<simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint, std::unique_ptr<simgrid::kernel::routing::NetPoint, py::nodelete>>(
+ m, "NetPoint", "NetPoint object");
+
+ /* Class Link */
+ py::class_<simgrid::s4u::Link, std::unique_ptr<simgrid::s4u::Link, py::nodelete>> link(m, "Link", "Network link");
+ link.def("set_latency", py::overload_cast<const std::string&>(&simgrid::s4u::Link::set_latency), "Set the latency");
+ link.def("set_latency", py::overload_cast<double>(&simgrid::s4u::Link::set_latency), "Set the latency");
+ link.def("set_sharing_policy", &simgrid::s4u::Link::set_sharing_policy, "Set sharing policy for this link");
+ link.def("seal", &simgrid::s4u::Link::seal, "Seal this link");
+ link.def_property_readonly(
+ "name",
+ [](const simgrid::s4u::Link* self) {
+ return std::string(self->get_name().c_str()); // Convert from xbt::string because of MC
+ },
+ "The name of this link");
+ py::enum_<simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy>(link, "SharingPolicy")
+ .value("NONLINEAR", simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy::NONLINEAR)
+ .value("WIFI", simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy::WIFI)
+ .value("SPLITDUPLEX", simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy::SPLITDUPLEX)
+ .value("SHARED", simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy::SHARED)
+ .value("FATPIPE", simgrid::s4u::Link::SharingPolicy::FATPIPE)
+ .export_values();
+
+ /* Class LinkInRoute */
+ py::class_<simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute> linkinroute(m, "LinkInRoute", "Abstraction to add link in routes");
+ linkinroute.def(py::init<const simgrid::s4u::Link*>());
+ linkinroute.def(py::init<const simgrid::s4u::Link*, simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute::Direction>());
+ py::enum_<simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute::Direction>(linkinroute, "Direction")
+ .value("UP", simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute::Direction::UP)
+ .value("DOWN", simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute::Direction::DOWN)
+ .value("NONE", simgrid::s4u::LinkInRoute::Direction::NONE)
+ .export_values();
+
+ /* Class Split-Duplex Link */
+ py::class_<simgrid::s4u::SplitDuplexLink, simgrid::s4u::Link,
+ std::unique_ptr<simgrid::s4u::SplitDuplexLink, py::nodelete>>(m, "SplitDuplexLink",
+ "Network split-duplex link")
+ .def("get_link_up", &simgrid::s4u::SplitDuplexLink::get_link_up, "Get link direction up")
+ .def("get_link_down", &simgrid::s4u::SplitDuplexLink::get_link_down, "Get link direction down");
+
/* Class Mailbox */
py::class_<simgrid::s4u::Mailbox, std::unique_ptr<Mailbox, py::nodelete>>(m, "Mailbox", "Mailbox")
.def(
return data;
},
py::call_guard<GilScopedRelease>(), "Blocking data reception")
- .def("set_receiver",
- [](Mailbox* self, ActorPtr actor) {
- self->set_receiver(actor);
- },
- py::call_guard<GilScopedRelease>(),
- "Sets the actor as permanent receiver");
+ .def(
+ "get_async",
+ [](Mailbox* self) -> std::tuple<simgrid::s4u::CommPtr, PyGetAsync> {
+ PyGetAsync wrap;
+ auto comm = self->get_async(wrap.get());
+ return std::make_tuple(std::move(comm), std::move(wrap));
+ },
+ py::call_guard<GilScopedRelease>(),
+ "Non-blocking data reception. Use data.get() to get the python object after the communication has finished")
+ .def(
+ "set_receiver", [](Mailbox* self, ActorPtr actor) { self->set_receiver(actor); },
+ py::call_guard<GilScopedRelease>(), "Sets the actor as permanent receiver");
+
+ /* Class PyGetAsync */
+ py::class_<PyGetAsync>(m, "PyGetAsync", "Wrapper for async get communications")
+ .def(py::init<>())
+ .def(
+ "get", [](PyGetAsync* self) { return py::reinterpret_steal<py::object>(*(self->get())); },
+ "Get python object after async communication in receiver side");
/* Class Comm */
py::class_<simgrid::s4u::Comm, simgrid::s4u::CommPtr>(m, "Comm", "Communication")