Fix most of spelling mistakes in src/

[simgrid.git] / src / smpi / colls / reduce / reduce-rab.cpp

diff --git a/src/smpi/colls/reduce/reduce-rab.cpp b/src/smpi/colls/reduce/reduce-rab.cpp
index ef73930..c1e5cf7 100644 (file)
--- a/src/smpi/colls/reduce/reduce-rab.cpp
+++ b/src/smpi/colls/reduce/reduce-rab.cpp
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 
    Exa.: size=13 ==> n=3, r=5  (i.e. size == 13 == 2**n+r ==  2**3 + 5)
 
-   The algorithm needs for the execution of one Colls::reduce
+   The algorithm needs for the execution of one colls::reduce
 
    - for r==0
      exec_time = n*(L1+L2)     + buf_lng * (1-1/2**n) * (T1 + T2 + O/d)
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Step 5.n)
      7: { [(a+b)+(c+d)] + [(e+f)+(g+h)] } + { [(i+j)+k] + [l+m] } for H
 
 
-For Colls::allreduce:
+For colls::allreduce:
 ------------------
 
 Step 6.1)
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ Step 7)
      on all nodes 0..12
 
 
-For Colls::reduce:
+For colls::reduce:
 ---------------
 
 Step 6.0)
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ Benchmark results on CRAY T3E
       otherwise the new protocol is used (see variable Ldb).
    3) These lines show the bandwidth (= buffer length / execution time)
       for both protocols.
-   4) This line shows that the limit is choosen well if the ratio is
-      between 0.95 (loosing 5% for buffer length near and >=limit)
+   4) This line shows that the limit is chosen well if the ratio is
+      between 0.95 (losing 5% for buffer length near and >=limit)
       and 1.10 (not gaining 10% for buffer length near and <limit).
    5) This line shows that the new protocol is 2..7 times faster
       for long counts.
@@ -517,7 +517,8 @@ static void MPI_I_do_op(void* b1, void* b2, void* rslt, int cnt,
 REDUCE_LIMITS
 namespace simgrid{
 namespace smpi{
-static int MPI_I_anyReduce(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype mpi_datatype, MPI_Op mpi_op, int root, MPI_Comm comm, int is_all)
+static int MPI_I_anyReduce(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype mpi_datatype, MPI_Op mpi_op,
+                           int root, MPI_Comm comm, bool is_all)
 {
   char *scr1buf, *scr2buf, *scr3buf, *xxx, *sendbuf, *recvbuf;
   int myrank, size, x_base, x_size, computed, idx;
@@ -942,21 +943,21 @@ static int MPI_I_anyReduce(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Da
   } /* new_prot */
   /*otherwise:*/
   if (is_all)
-   return( Colls::allreduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, mpi_datatype, mpi_op, comm) );
+    return (colls::allreduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, mpi_datatype, mpi_op, comm));
   else
-   return( Colls::reduce(Sendbuf,Recvbuf, count,mpi_datatype,mpi_op, root, comm) );
+    return (colls::reduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, mpi_datatype, mpi_op, root, comm));
 }
 #endif /*REDUCE_LIMITS*/
 
 
-int Coll_reduce_rab::reduce(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype datatype, MPI_Op op, int root, MPI_Comm comm)
+int reduce__rab(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype datatype, MPI_Op op, int root, MPI_Comm comm)
 {
-  return( MPI_I_anyReduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, datatype, op, root, comm, 0) );
+  return MPI_I_anyReduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, datatype, op, root, comm, false);
 }
 
-int Coll_allreduce_rab::allreduce(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype datatype, MPI_Op op, MPI_Comm comm)
+int allreduce__rab(const void* Sendbuf, void* Recvbuf, int count, MPI_Datatype datatype, MPI_Op op, MPI_Comm comm)
 {
-  return( MPI_I_anyReduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, datatype, op,   -1, comm, 1) );
+  return MPI_I_anyReduce(Sendbuf, Recvbuf, count, datatype, op, -1, comm, true);
 }
 }
 }