- node.id = atoi(argv[1]);
- node.stream =
- (RngStream)MSG_host_get_property_value(MSG_host_self(), "stream");
+ node.id = xbt_str_parse_int(argv[1],"Invalid ID: %s");
+ node.stream = (RngStream)MSG_host_get_property_value(MSG_host_self(), "stream");
get_mailbox(node.id, node.mailbox);
node.next_finger_to_fix = 0;
node.fingers = xbt_new0(s_finger_t, nb_bits);
get_mailbox(node.id, node.mailbox);
node.next_finger_to_fix = 0;
node.fingers = xbt_new0(s_finger_t, nb_bits);
XBT_DEBUG("Received a task (%p)", task_received);
task_data_t ans_data = MSG_task_get_data(task_received);
XBT_DEBUG("Received a task (%p)", task_received);
task_data_t ans_data = MSG_task_get_data(task_received);
- // Once upon a time, our code assumed that here, task_received != task_sent all the time
- //
- // This assumption is wrong (as messages from differing round can interleave), leading to a bug in our code.
- // We failed to find this bug directly, as it only occured on large platforms, leading to hardly usable traces.
- // Instead, we used the model-checker to track down the issue by adding the following test here in the code:
- // if (MC_is_active()) {
- // MC_assert(task_received == task_sent);
+ // Once upon a time, our code assumed that here, task_received != task_sent all the time
+ //
+ // This assumption is wrong (as messages from differing round can interleave), leading to a bug in our code.
+ // We failed to find this bug directly, as it only occured on large platforms, leading to hardly usable traces.
+ // Instead, we used the model-checker to track down the issue by adding the following test here in the code:
+ // if (MC_is_active()) {
+ // MC_assert(task_received == task_sent);
- // That explained the bug in a snap, with a very cool example and everything.
- //
- // This MC_assert is now desactivated as the case is now properly handled in our code and we don't want the
- // MC to fail any further under that condition, but this comment is here to as a memorial for this first
- // brillant victory of the model-checking in the SimGrid community :)
+ // That explained the bug in a snap, with a very cool example and everything.
+ //
+ // This MC_assert is now desactivated as the case is now properly handled in our code and we don't want the
+ // MC to fail any further under that condition, but this comment is here to as a memorial for this first
+ // brillant victory of the model-checking in the SimGrid community :)
- if (argc < 3) {
- printf("Usage: %s [-nb_bits=n] [-timeout=t] platform_file deployment_file\n", argv[0]);
- printf("example: %s ../msg_platform.xml chord.xml\n", argv[0]);
- exit(1);
- }
+ xbt_assert(argc > 2,
+ "Usage: %s [-nb_bits=n] [-timeout=t] platform_file deployment_file\n"
+ "\tExample: %s ../msg_platform.xml chord.xml\n",
+ argv[0], argv[0]);
char **options = &argv[1];
while (!strncmp(options[0], "-", 1)) {
int length = strlen("-nb_bits=");
if (!strncmp(options[0], "-nb_bits=", length) && strlen(options[0]) > length) {
char **options = &argv[1];
while (!strncmp(options[0], "-", 1)) {
int length = strlen("-nb_bits=");
if (!strncmp(options[0], "-nb_bits=", length) && strlen(options[0]) > length) {
XBT_DEBUG("Set nb_bits to %d", nb_bits);
}
else {
length = strlen("-timeout=");
if (!strncmp(options[0], "-timeout=", length) && strlen(options[0]) > length) {
XBT_DEBUG("Set nb_bits to %d", nb_bits);
}
else {
length = strlen("-timeout=");
if (!strncmp(options[0], "-timeout=", length) && strlen(options[0]) > length) {