./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
make dist \endverbatim
-\subsection faq_setting Setting up your own code
+Moreover, you should never call the autotools manually since you must run
+them in a specific order with specific arguments. Most of the times, the
+makefiles will automatically call the tools for you. When it's not possible
+(such as the first time you checkout the CVS), use the ./bootstrap command
+to call them explicitely.
+
+If you need to compile the CVS version on a machine where all these
+dependencies are not met, the easiest is to do <tt>make dist</tt> in the CVS
+dir, on another machine where all dependencies are met. It will create an
+archive you may deploy on other sites just as a regular stable release.
+
+\subsection faq_setting_MSG Setting up your own MSG code
Do not build your simulator by modifying the SimGrid examples. Go
outside the SimGrid source tree and create your own working directory
previous example should be enough for a first try but you may want to
perform some more complex compilations...
+\subsection faq_setting_GRAS Setting up your own GRAS code
+
+If you use the GRAS interface instead of the MSG one, then previous section
+is not the better source of information. Instead, you should check the GRAS
+tutorial in general, and the \ref GRAS_tut_tour_setup in particular.
+
+\subsection faq_crosscompile Cross-compiling a Windows DLL of SimGrid from linux
+
+At the moment, we do not distribute Windows pre-compiled version of SimGrid
+because the support for this platform is still experimental. We know that
+some parts of the GRAS environment do not work, and we think that the others
+environments (MSG and SD) have good chances to work, but we didn't test
+ourselves. This section explains how we generate the SimGrid DLL so that you
+can build it for yourself. First of all, you need to have a version more
+recent than 3.1 (ie, a CVS version as time of writting).
+
+In order to cross-compile the package to windows from linux, you need to
+install mingw32 (minimalist gnu win32). On Debian, you can do so by
+installing the packages mingw32 (compiler), mingw32-binutils (linker and
+so), mingw32-runtime.
+
+You can use the VPATH support of configure to compile at the same time for
+linux and windows without dupplicating the source nor cleaning the tree
+between each. Just run bootstrap (if you use the CVS) to run the autotools.
+Then, create a linux and a win directories. Then, type:
+\verbatim cd linux; ../configure --srcdir=.. <usual configure flags>; make; cd ..
+cd win; ../configure --srcdir=.. --host=i586-mingw32msvc <flags>; make; cd ..
+\endverbatim
+The trick to VPATH builds is to call configure from another directory,
+passing it an extra --srcdir argument to tell it where all the sources are.
+It will understand you want to use VPATH. Then, the trick to cross-compile
+is simply to add a --host argument specifying the target you want to build
+for. The i586-mingw32msvc string is what you have to pass to use the mingw32
+environment as distributed in Debian.
+
+After that, you can run all make targets from both directories, and test
+easily that what you change for one arch does not break the other one.
+
+It is possible that this VPATH build thing breaks from time to time in the
+CVS since it's quite fragile, but it's granted to work in any released
+version. If you experience problems, drop us a mail.
+
+Another possible source of issue is that at the moment, building the
+examples request to use the gras_stub_generator tool, which is a compiled
+program, not a script. In cross-compilation, you need to cross-execute with
+wine for example, which is not really pleasant. We are working on this, but
+in the meanwhile, simply don't build the examples in cross-compilation
+(<tt>cd src</tt> before running make).
+
+Program (cross-)compiled with mingw32 do request an extra DLL at run-time to be
+usable. For example, if you want to test your build with wine, you should do
+the following to put this library where wine looks for DLLs.
+\verbatim
+cp /usr/share/doc/mingw32-runtime/mingwm10.dll.gz ~/.wine/c/windows/system/
+gunzip ~/.wine/c/windows/system/mingwm10.dll.gz
+\endverbatim
+
+The DLL is builded in src/.libs, and installed in the <i>prefix</i>/bin directory
+when you run make install.
+
+If you want to use it in a native project on windows, you need to use
+simgrid.dll and mingwm10.dll. For each DLL, you need to build .def file
+under linux (listing the defined symbols), and convert it into a .lib file
+under windows (specifying this in a way that windows compilers like). To
+generate the def files, run (under linux):
+\verbatim echo "LIBRARY libsimgrid-0.dll" > simgrid.def
+echo EXPORTS >> simgrid.def
+nm libsimgrid-0.dll | grep ' T _' | sed 's/.* T _//' >> simgrid.def
+nm libsimgrid-0.dll | grep ' D _' | sed 's/.* D _//' | sed 's/$/ DATA/' >> simgrid.def
+
+echo "LIBRARY mingwm10.dll" > mingwm10.def
+echo EXPORTS >> mingwm10.def
+nm mingwm10.dll | grep ' T _' | sed 's/.* T _//' >> mingwm10.def
+nm mingwm10.dll | grep ' D _' | sed 's/.* D _//' | sed 's/$/ DATA/' >> mingwm10.def
+\endverbatim
+
+To create the import .lib files, use the <tt>lib</tt> windows tool (from
+MSVC) the following way to produce simgrid.lib and mingwm10.lib
+\verbatim lib /def:simgrid.def
+lib /def:mingwm10.def
+\endverbatim
+
+If you happen to use Borland C Builder, the right command line is the
+following (note that you don't need any file.def to get this working).
+\verbatim implib simgrid.lib libsimgrid-0.dll
+implib mingwm10.lib mingwm10.dll
+\endverbatim
+
+Then, set the following parameters in Visual C++ 2005:
+Linker -> Input -> Additional dependencies = simgrid.lib mingwm10.lib
+
+Just in case you wonder how to generate a DLL from libtool in another
+project, we added -no-undefined to any lib*_la_LDFLAGS variables so that
+libtool accepts to generate a dynamic library under windows. Then, to make
+it true, we pass any dependencies (such as -lws2 under windows or -lpthread
+on need) on the linking line. Passing such deps is a good idea anyway so
+that they get noted in the library itself, avoiding the users to know about
+our dependencies and put them manually on their compilation line. Then we
+added the AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL macro just before AC_PROG_LIBTOOL in the
+configure.ac. It means that we exported any symbols which need to be.
+Nowadays, functions get automatically exported, so we don't need to load our
+header files with tons of __declspec(dllexport) cruft. We only need to do so
+for data, but there is no public data in SimGrid so we are good.
+
\section faq_simgrid I'm new to SimGrid. I have some questions. Where should I start?
You are at the right place... Having a look to these
MSG_task_get_remaining_computation(), MSG_task_get_data_size(),
and MSG_task_get_data().
-You could use a dictionnary (#xbt_dict_t) of dynars (#xbt_dict_t). If
+You could use a dictionnary (#xbt_dict_t) of dynars (#xbt_dynar_t). If
you still don't see how to do it, please come back to us...
-\subsection faq_MIA_asynchronous I want to do asynchronous communications.
+\subsection faq_MIA_asynchronous I want to do asynchronous communications in MSG
Up until now, there is no asynchronous communications in MSG. However,
you can create as many process as you want so you should be able to do
process only to handle communications may be problematic in term of
performance at some point). I'll add it in the distribution asap.
-\subsection faq_MIA_thread_synchronization I need to synchronize my processes
+\subsection faq_MIA_thread_synchronization I need to synchronize my MSG processes
You obviously cannot use pthread_mutexes of pthread_conds. The best
thing would be to propose similar structures. Unfortunately, we
case, please detail what you mean on the mailing list, and we will extend
this FAQ section to fit your taste if possible.
+\subsection faq_MIA_communication_time How can I get the *real* communication time ?
+
+Communications are synchronous and thus if you simply get the time
+before and after a communication, you'll only get the transmission
+time and the time spent to really communicate (it will also take into
+account the time spent waiting for the other party to be
+ready). However, getting the *real* communication time is not really
+hard either. The following solution is a good starting point.
+
+\verbatim
+int sender()
+{
+ m_task_t task = MSG_task_create("Task", task_comp_size, task_comm_size,
+ calloc(1,sizeof(double)));
+ *((double*) task->data) = MSG_get_clock();
+ MSG_task_put(task, slaves[i % slaves_count], PORT_22);
+ INFO0("Send completed");
+ return 0;
+}
+int receiver()
+{
+ m_task_t task = NULL;
+ double time1,time2;
+
+ time1 = MSG_get_clock();
+ a = MSG_task_get(&(task), PORT_22);
+ time2 = MSG_get_clock();
+ if(time1<*((double *)task->data))
+ time1 = *((double *) task->data);
+ INFO1("Communication time : \"%f\" ", time2-time1);
+ free(task->data);
+ MSG_task_destroy(task);
+ return 0;
+}
+\endverbatim
+
\subsection faq_MIA_batch_scheduler Is there a native support for batch schedulers in SimGrid ?
No, there is no native support for batch schedulers and none is
Those two things are working, but we want to make everything as clean as
possible before releasing SimGrid v.3.
-So what about those nice DAGs we used to have in SimGrid v.1.? They're not
-anymore in SimGrid v.3. Let me recall you the way SimGrid 3 is organized:
+So what about those nice DAGs we used to have in SimGrid v.1.? They're
+not anymore in SimGrid v.3. At least not in their original form... Let
+me recall you the way SimGrid 3 is organized:
\verbatim
________________
----------------
\endverbatim
-XBT is our tool box and now, you should have an idea of what the other ones
-are. As you can see, the primitive SG is not here anymore. However it could
-still be brought back if people really need it. Here is how it would fit.
+XBT is our tool box and now, you should have an idea of what the other
+ones are. As you can see, the primitive SG is not here
+anymore. However we have written a brand new and cleaner API for this
+purpose: \ref SD_API. It is built directly on top of SURF and provides
+an API rather close to the old SG:
\verbatim
______________________
| User code |
|____________________|
-| | MSG | GRAS | SG |
+| | MSG | GRAS | SD |
| -------------------|
| | SURF |
| -------------------|
----------------------
\endverbatim
-Re-implementing SG on top of SURF is really straightforward (it only
-requires a little bit of time that I really don't have right now)
-since the only thing that lacks to SURF is the DAG part. But adding it
-to SURF would slow it down and therefore slow MSG and GRAS which is
-not a good thing. However it is really not on the top of our TODO
-list because we have to work on GRAS, and its MPI counterpart, and a
-parallel task model, and ... Anyway, we finally have migrated our CVS
-to gforge so people that are interested by helping on this part will
-have the possibility to do it.
+The nice thing is that, as it is writen on top of SURF, it seamlessly
+support DAG of parallel tasks as well as complex communications
+patterns. Some old codes using SG are currently under rewrite using
+\ref SD_API to check that all needful functions are provided.
\subsection faq_SG_DAG How to implement a distributed dynamic scheduler of DAGs.
Distributed is somehow "contagious". If you start making distributed
-decisions, there is no way to handle DAGs directly anymore (unless I am
-missing something). You have to encode your DAGs in term of communicating
-process to make the whole scheduling process distributed. Believe me, it is
-worth the effort since you'll then be able to try your algorithms in a very
-wide variety of conditions. Here is an example of how you could do that.
-Assume T1 has to be done before T2.
+decisions, there is no way to handle DAGs directly anymore (unless I
+am missing something). You have to encode your DAGs in term of
+communicating process to make the whole scheduling process
+distributed. Here is an example of how you could do that. Assume T1
+has to be done before T2.
\verbatim
int your_agent(int argc, char *argv[] {
\endverbatim
If you decide that the distributed part is not that much important and that
-DAG is really the level of abstraction you want to work with (but it
-prevents you from having "realistic" platform modeling), then you should
-keep using the 2.18.5 versions until somebody has ported SG on top of SURF.
-Note however that SURF will be slower than the old SG to handle traces with
-a lots of variations (there is no trace integration anymore).
-
-\subsection faq_SG_future Will SG come back in the maintained branch one day?
-
-Sure. In fact, we already have thought about a new and cleaner API:
-\verbatim
-void* SG_link_get_data(SG_link_t link);
-void SG_link_set_data(SG_link_t link, void *data);
-const char* SG_link_get_name(SG_link_t link);
-double SG_link_get_capacity(SG_link_t link);
-double SG_link_get_current_bandwidth(SG_link_t link);
-double SG_link_get_current_latency(SG_link_t link);
-
-SG_workstation_t SG_workstation_get_by_name(const char *name);
-SG_workstation_t* SG_workstation_get_list(void);
-int SG_workstation_get_number(void);
-void SG_workstation_set_data(SG_workstation_t workstation, void *data);
-void * SG_workstation_get_data(SG_workstation_t workstation);
-const char* SG_workstation_get_name(SG_workstation_t workstation);
-SG_link_t* SG_workstation_route_get_list(SG_workstation_t src, SG_workstation_t dst);
-int SG_workstation_route_get_size(SG_workstation_t src, SG_workstation_t dst);
-double SG_workstation_get_power(SG_workstation_t workstation);
-double SG_workstation_get_available_power(SG_workstation_t workstation);
-
-SG_task_t SG_task_create(const char *name, void *data, double amount);
-int SG_task_schedule(SG_task_t task, int workstation_nb,
- SG_workstation_t **workstation_list, double *computation_amount,
- double *communication_amount, double rate);
-
-void* SG_task_get_data(SG_task_t task);
-void SG_task_set_data(SG_task_t task, void *data);
-const char* SG_task_get_name(SG_task_t task);
-double SG_task_get_amount(SG_task_t task);
-double SG_task_get_remaining_amount(SG_task_t task);
-void SG_task_dependency_add(const char *name, void *data, SG_task_t src, SG_task_t dst);
-void SG_task_dependency_remove(SG_task_t src, SG_task_t dst);
-e_SG_task_state_t SG_task_state_get(SG_task_t task); /* e_SG_task_state_t can be either SG_SCHEDULED, SG_RUNNING, SG_DONE, or SG_FAILED */
-void SG_task_watch(SG_task_t task, e_SG_task_state_t state); /* SG_simulate will stop as soon as the state of this task is the one given in argument.
- Watch-point is then automatically removed */
-void SG_task_unwatch(SG_task_t task, e_SG_task_state_t state);
-
-void SG_task_unschedule(SG_task_t task); /* change state and rerun.. */
-
-SG_task_t *SG_simulate(double how_long); /* returns a NULL-terminated array of SG_task_t whose state has changed */
-\endverbatim
-
-We're just looking for somebody to implement it... :)
+DAG is really the level of abstraction you want to work with, then you should
+give a try to \ref SD_API.
\section faq_dynamic Dynamic resources and platform building
An example of this trick is distributed in the file examples/msg/msg_test_surfxml_bypassed.c
-\section faq_troubleshooting Troubleshooting
-
-\subsection faq_compil_trouble ./configure fails!
-
-We now only one reason for the configure to fail:
-
- - <b>You are using a borken build environment</b>\n
- If symptom is that configure complains about gcc not being able to build
- executables, you are probably missing the libc6-dev package. Damn Ubuntu.
-
-If you experience other kind of issue, please get in touch with us. We are
-always interested in improving our portability to new systems.
-
-\subsection faq_distcheck_fails Dude! "make check" fails on my machine!
-
-Don't assume we never run this target, because we do. Really. Promise!
-
-There is several reasons which may cause the make check to fail on your
-machine:
-
- - <b>You are using a borken libc (probably concerning the contextes)</b>.\n
- The symptom is that the "make check" fails within the examples/msg directory.\n
- By default, SimGrid uses something called ucontexts. This is part of the
- libc, but it's quite undertested. For example, some (old) versions of the
- glibc on alpha do not implement these functions, but provide the stubs
- (which return ENOSYS: not implemented). It fools our detection mecanism
- and leads to segfaults.\n
- On some x86_64, the pointer to function is stored into a integer, but int
- are 32bits only on this arch while pointers are 64bits. Our detection
- mecanism also fails to detect the problem, which leads to segfaults.\n
- In both cases, there is not much we can do to fix the bug. We are working
- on a workaround for x86_64 machines, but in the meanwhile, you can
- compile with --with-context=pthread to avoid ucontext completely. You'll
- be a bit more limitated in the number of simulated processes you can start
- concurently, but 5000 processes is still enough for most purposes, isn't
- it?\n
- This limitation is the reason why we insist on using this piece of ...
- software even if it's so troublesome.\n
- <b>=> use --with-pthread on AMD64 architecture</b>
-
- - <b>There is a bug in SimGrid we aren't aware of</b>.\n
- If none of the above apply, please drop us a mail on the mailing list so
- that we can check it out.
+\section faq_limits Pushing the limits
\subsection faq_context_1000 I want thousands of simulated processes
low, you'll get a segfault. The token ring example, which is quite simple,
runs with 40kb stacks.
-\subsection faq_longjmp longjmp madness
+\section faq_troubleshooting Troubleshooting
+
+\subsection faq_compil_trouble ./configure fails!
+
+We now only one reason for the configure to fail:
+
+ - <b>You are using a borken build environment</b>\n
+ If symptom is that configure complains about gcc not being able to build
+ executables, you are probably missing the libc6-dev package. Damn Ubuntu.
+
+If you experience other kind of issue, please get in touch with us. We are
+always interested in improving our portability to new systems.
+
+\subsection faq_distcheck_fails Dude! "make check" fails on my machine!
+
+Don't assume we never run this target, because we do. Really. Promise!
+
+There is several reasons which may cause the make check to fail on your
+machine:
+
+ - <b>You are using a borken libc (probably concerning the contextes)</b>.\n
+ The symptom is that the "make check" fails within the examples/msg directory.\n
+ By default, SimGrid uses something called ucontexts. This is part of the
+ libc, but it's quite undertested. For example, some (old) versions of the
+ glibc on alpha do not implement these functions, but provide the stubs
+ (which return ENOSYS: not implemented). It fools our detection mecanism
+ and leads to segfaults.\n
+ On some x86_64, the pointer to function is stored into a integer, but int
+ are 32bits only on this arch while pointers are 64bits. Our detection
+ mecanism also fails to detect the problem, which leads to segfaults.\n
+ In both cases, there is not much we can do to fix the bug. We are working
+ on a workaround for x86_64 machines, but in the meanwhile, you can
+ compile with --with-context=pthread to avoid ucontext completely. You'll
+ be a bit more limitated in the number of simulated processes you can start
+ concurently, but 5000 processes is still enough for most purposes, isn't
+ it?\n
+ This limitation is the reason why we insist on using this piece of ...
+ software even if it's so troublesome.\n
+ <b>=> use --with-pthread on AMD64 architecture that do not have an
+ ultra-recent libc.</b>
+
+ - <b>There is a bug in SimGrid we aren't aware of</b>.\n
+ If none of the above apply, please drop us a mail on the mailing list so
+ that we can check it out.
+
+\subsection faq_longjmp longjmp madness in valgrind
This is when valgrind starts complaining about longjmp things, just like:
block. This is <b>evil</b>, and you must not do this. Did you read the section
about \ref XBT_ex??
+\subsection faq_valgrind Valgrind spits tons of errors!
+
+It may happen that valgrind, the memory debugger beloved by any decent C
+programmer, spits tons of warnings like the following :
+\verbatim ==8414== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+==8414== at 0x400882D: (within /lib/ld-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x414EDE9: (within /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x400B105: (within /lib/ld-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x414F937: _dl_open (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x4150F4C: (within /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x400B105: (within /lib/ld-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x415102D: __libc_dlopen_mode (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x412D6B9: backtrace (in /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc-2.3.6.so)
+==8414== by 0x8076446: xbt_dictelm_get_ext (dict_elm.c:714)
+==8414== by 0x80764C1: xbt_dictelm_get (dict_elm.c:732)
+==8414== by 0x8079010: xbt_cfg_register (config.c:208)
+==8414== by 0x806821B: MSG_config (msg_config.c:42)
+\endverbatim
+
+This problem is somewhere in the libc when using the backtraces and there is
+very few things we can do ourselves to fix it. Instead, here is how to tell
+valgrind to ignore the error. Add the following to your ~/.valgrind.supp (or
+create this file on need). Make sure to change the obj line according to
+your personnal mileage (change 2.3.6 to the actual version you are using,
+which you can retrieve with a simple "ls /lib/ld*.so").
+
+\verbatim {
+ name: Backtrace madness
+ Memcheck:Cond
+ obj:/lib/ld-2.3.6.so
+ fun:dl_open_worker
+ fun:_dl_open
+ fun:do_dlopen
+ fun:dlerror_run
+ fun:__libc_dlopen_mode
+}\endverbatim
+
+Then, you have to specify valgrind to use this suppression file by passing
+the <tt>--suppressions=$HOME/.valgrind.supp</tt> option on the command line.
+You can also add the following to your ~/.bashrc so that it gets passed
+automatically. Actually, it passes a bit more options to valgrind, and this
+happen to be my personnal settings. Check the valgrind documentation for
+more information.
+
+\verbatim export VALGRIND_OPTS="--leak-check=yes --leak-resolution=high --num-callers=40 --tool=memcheck --suppressions=$HOME/.valgrind.supp" \endverbatim
+
\subsection faq_flexml_limit I get the message "surf_parse_lex: Assertion `next<limit' failed."
This is because your platform file is too big for the parser.
before the client get a chance to read them (use gras_os_sleep() to delay
the server), or the server died awfully before the client got the data.
-
\subsection faq_deadlock There is a deadlock !!!
Unfortunately, we cannot debug every code written in SimGrid. We
\endverbatim
You should try to use the surfxml_update.pl script that can be found
<a href="http://gforge.inria.fr/plugins/scmcvs/cvsweb.php/contrib/platform_generation/?cvsroot=cvsroot%2Fsimgrid">here</a>.
-
+
+\subsection faq_surf_network_latency I get weird timings when I play with the latencies.
+
+OK, first of all, remember that units should be Bytes, Flops and
+Seconds. If you don't use such units, some SimGrid constants (e.g. the
+SG_TCP_CTE_GAMMA constant used in most network models) won't have the
+right unit and you'll end up with weird results.
+
+Here is what happens with a single transfer of size L on a link
+(bw,lat) when nothing else happens.
+
+\verbatim
+0-----lat--------------------------------------------------t
+|-----|**** real_bw =min(bw,SG_TCP_CTE_GAMMA/(2*lat)) *****|
+\endverbatim
+
+In more complex situations, this min is the solution of a complex
+max-min linear system. Have a look
+<a href="http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/simgrid-devel/2006-April/thread.html">here</a>
+and read the two threads "Bug in SURF?" and "Surf bug not
+fixed?". You'll have a few other examples of such computations. You
+can also read "A Network Model for Simulation of Grid Application" by
+Henri Casanova and Loris Marchal to have all the details. The fact
+that the real_bw is smaller than bw is easy to understand. The fact
+that real_bw is smaller than SG_TCP_CTE_GAMMA/(2*lat) is due to the
+window-based congestion mechanism of TCP. With TCP, you can't exploit
+your huge network capacity if you don't have a good round-trip-time
+because of the acks...
+
+Anyway, what you get is t=lat + L/min(bw,SG_TCP_CTE_GAMMA/(2*lat)).
+
+ * if I you set (bw,lat)=(100 000 000, 0.00001), you get t = 1.00001 (you fully
+use your link)
+ * if I you set (bw,lat)=(100 000 000, 0.0001), you get t = 1.0001 (you're on the
+limit)
+ * if I you set (bw,lat)=(100 000 000, 0.001), you get t = 10.001 (ouch!)
+
+This bound on the effective bandwidth of a flow is not the only thing
+that may make your result be unexpected. For example, two flows
+competing on a saturated link receive an amount of bandwidth inversely
+proportional to their round trip time.
+
+\subsection faq_bugrepport So I've found a bug in SimGrid. How to report it?
+
+We do our best to make sure to hammer away any bugs of SimGrid, but this is
+still an academic project so please be patient if/when you find bugs in it.
+If you do, the best solution is to drop an email either on the simgrid-user
+or the simgrid-devel mailing list and explain us about the issue. You can
+also decide to open a formal bug report using the
+<a href="https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/?atid=165&group_id=12&func=browse">relevant
+interface</a>. You need to login on the server to get the ability to submit
+bugs.
+
+We will do our best to solve any problem repported, but you need to help us
+finding the issue. Just telling "it segfault" isn't enough. Telling "It
+segfaults when running the attached simulator" doesn't really help either.
+You may find the following article interesting to see how to repport
+informative bug repports:
+http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html (it is not SimGrid
+specific at all, but it's full of good advices).
+
\author Arnaud Legrand (arnaud.legrand::imag.fr)
\author Martin Quinson (martin.quinson::loria.fr)
