-/* Copyright (c) 2010-2014. The SimGrid Team.
+/* Copyright (c) 2010-2015. The SimGrid Team.
* All rights reserved. */
/* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the license (GNU LGPL) which comes with this package. */
#include <stdio.h>
-#include "msg/msg.h"
+#include "simgrid/msg.h"
#include "xbt/log.h"
#include "xbt/asserts.h"
#include "simgrid/modelchecker.h"
#include <xbt/RngStream.h>
+#include "src/mc/mc_replay.h" // FIXME: this is an internal header
/** @addtogroup MSG_examples
*
XBT_DEBUG("Received a task (%p)", task_received);
task_data_t ans_data = MSG_task_get_data(task_received);
- // Once upon a time, our code assumed that here, task_received != task_sent all the time
- //
- // This assumption is wrong (as messages from differing round can interleave), leading to a bug in our code.
- // We failed to find this bug directly, as it only occured on large platforms, leading to hardly usable traces.
- // Instead, we used the model-checker to track down the issue by adding the following test here in the code:
- // if (MC_is_active()) {
- // MC_assert(task_received == task_sent);
+ // Once upon a time, our code assumed that here, task_received != task_sent all the time
+ //
+ // This assumption is wrong (as messages from differing round can interleave), leading to a bug in our code.
+ // We failed to find this bug directly, as it only occured on large platforms, leading to hardly usable traces.
+ // Instead, we used the model-checker to track down the issue by adding the following test here in the code:
+ // if (MC_is_active()) {
+ // MC_assert(task_received == task_sent);
// }
- // That explained the bug in a snap, with a very cool example and everything.
- //
- // This MC_assert is now desactivated as the case is now properly handled in our code and we don't want the
- // MC to fail any further under that condition, but this comment is here to as a memorial for this first
- // brillant victory of the model-checking in the SimGrid community :)
+ // That explained the bug in a snap, with a very cool example and everything.
+ //
+ // This MC_assert is now desactivated as the case is now properly handled in our code and we don't want the
+ // MC to fail any further under that condition, but this comment is here to as a memorial for this first
+ // brillant victory of the model-checking in the SimGrid community :)
if (task_received != task_sent ||
ans_data->type != TASK_FIND_SUCCESSOR_ANSWER) {
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
MSG_init(&argc, argv);
- if (argc < 3) {
- printf("Usage: %s [-nb_bits=n] [-timeout=t] platform_file deployment_file\n", argv[0]);
- printf("example: %s ../msg_platform.xml chord.xml\n", argv[0]);
- exit(1);
- }
+ xbt_assert(argc > 2,
+ "Usage: %s [-nb_bits=n] [-timeout=t] platform_file deployment_file\n"
+ "\tExample: %s ../msg_platform.xml chord.xml\n",
+ argv[0], argv[0]);
char **options = &argv[1];
while (!strncmp(options[0], "-", 1)) {
chord_exit();
- if (res == MSG_OK)
- return 0;
- else
- return 1;
+ return res != MSG_OK;
}