result in *fat* simulation hindering debugging.
- It was really boring to write 25,000 entries in the deployment
file, so I wrote a little script
- <tt>examples/gras/tokenS/make_deployment.pl</tt>, which you may
+ <tt>examples/gras/mutual_exclusion/simple_token/make_deployment.pl</tt>, which you may
want to adapt to your case. You could also think about hijacking
the SURFXML parser (have look at \ref faq_flexml_bypassing).
- The deployment file became quite big, so I had to do what is in
user don't get into trouble about this. You want to tune this
size to increse the number of processes. This is the
<tt>STACK_SIZE</tt> define in
- <tt>src/xbt/context_private.h</tt>, which is 128kb by default.
+ <tt>src/xbt/xbt_context_sysv.c</tt>, which is 128kb by default.
Reduce this as much as you can, but be warned that if this value
is too low, you'll get a segfault. The token ring example, which
- is quite simple, runs with 40kb stacks.
+ is quite simple, runs with 40kb stacks.
+ - You may tweak the logs to reduce the stack size further. When
+ logging something, we try to build the string to display in a
+ char array on the stack. The size of this array is constant (and
+ equal to XBT_LOG_BUFF_SIZE, defined in include/xbt/log/h). If the
+ string is too large to fit this buffer, we move to a dynamically
+ sized buffer. In which case, we have to traverse one time the log
+ event arguments to compute the size we need for the buffer,
+ malloc it, and traverse the argument list again to do the actual
+ job.\n
+ The idea here is to move XBT_LOG_BUFF_SIZE to 1, forcing the logs
+ to use a dynamic array each time. This allows us to lower further
+ the stack size at the price of some performance loss...\n
+ This allowed me to run the reduce the stack size to ... 4k. Ie,
+ on my 1Gb laptop, I can run more than 250,000 processes!
\subsubsection faq_MIA_batch_scheduler Is there a native support for batch schedulers in SimGrid?
\subsubsection faq_trouble_errors_big_fat_warning I'm told that my XML files are too old.
-We have decided to change the units in SimGrid. Now we use Bytes, Flops and
-seconds instead of MBytes, MFlops and seconds... Units should be updated
-accordingly and the version of platform_description should be set to a
-valuer greater than 1:
+The format of the XML platform description files is sometimes
+improved. For example, we decided to change the units used in SimGrid
+from MBytes, MFlops and seconds to Bytes, Flops and seconds to ease
+people exchanging small messages. We also reworked the route
+descriptions to allow more compact descriptions.
+
+That is why the XML files are versionned using the 'version' attribute
+of the root tag. Currently, it should read:
\verbatim
- <platform_description version="1">
+ <platform version="2">
\endverbatim
-You should try to use the surfxml_update.pl script that can be found
-<a href="https://gforge.inria.fr/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/contrib/trunk/platform_generation/?rev=4721&root=simgrid"">here</a>.
-\subsection faq_trouble_valgrind Valgrind-related issues
+If your files are too old, you can use the simgrid_update_xml.pl
+script which can be found in the tools directory of the archive.
+
+\subsection faq_trouble_valgrind Valgrind-related and other debugger issues
If you don't, you really should use valgrind to debug your code, it's
almost magic.
-\subsubsection faq_trouble_vg_context Stack switching problems and truncated backtraces
-
-With the default version of simgrid, valgrind will probably spit tons
-of warnings about stack switching like the following, and produce
-truncated bactraces where only one call appears instead of the whole
-stack.
-
-\verbatim
-==14908== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change: 0xBEA2A48C --> 0x476F350
-==14908== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=1171541700 or greater
-==14908== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change: 0x476E1E4 --> 0xBEA2A48C
-==14908== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=1171537240 or greater
-==14908== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change: 0xBEA2A48C --> 0x4792420
-==14908== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=1171685268 or greater
-==14908== further instances of this message will not be shown.
-\endverbatim
-
-This is because valgrind don't like too much the UNIX98 contextes we
-use by default in simgrid for efficiency reasons. Simply add the
---with-pthread flag to your configure when debugging your code. You
-may also find --disable-compiler-optimization usefull if valgrind or
-gdb get fooled by the optimization done by the compiler. But you
-should remove these flages when everything works before going in
-production (before launching your 1252135 experiments), or everything
-will run only one third of the true SimGrid potential.
-
\subsubsection faq_trouble_vg_longjmp longjmp madness in valgrind
This is when valgrind starts complaining about longjmp things, just like:
==21434== at 0x420DC3A: __longjmp (__longjmp.S:48)
\endverbatim
-or even when it reports scary things like:
-
-\verbatim ==24023== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change: 0xBE3FF618 --> 0xBE7FF710
-x86->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF4 0xC7 0x83 0xD0
-==24023== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=4194552 or greater
-==24023== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
-==24023== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
-==24023== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
-==24023== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
-==24023== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
-==24023== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
-==24023== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
-==24023== you are not sure, please let us know.
-==24023== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
-==24023== probably kill your program.
-==24023==
-==24023== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
-==24023== Illegal opcode at address 0x420D234
-==24023== at 0x420D234: abort (abort.c:124)
-\endverbatim
-
This is the sign that you didn't used the exception mecanism well. Most
probably, you have a <tt>return;</tt> somewhere within a <tt>TRY{}</tt>
block. This is <b>evil</b>, and you must not do this. Did you read the section
\verbatim export VALGRIND_OPTS="--leak-check=yes --leak-resolution=high --num-callers=40 --tool=memcheck --suppressions=$HOME/.valgrind.supp" \endverbatim
+\subsubsection faq_trouble_backtraces Truncated backtraces
+
+When debugging SimGrid, it's easier to pass the
+--disable-compiler-optimization flag to the configure if valgrind or
+gdb get fooled by the optimization done by the compiler. But you
+should remove these flages when everything works before going in
+production (before launching your 1252135 experiments), or everything
+will run only one half of the true SimGrid potential.
+
\subsection faq_deadlock There is a deadlock in my code!!!
Unfortunately, we cannot debug every code written in SimGrid. We
