<a href="http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~alegrand/articles/Simgrid-Introduction.pdf">"obsolete" slides</a>)
may give you some insights on what SimGrid can help you to do and what
are its limitations. Then you definitely should read the \ref
-MSG_examples.
+msg_examples.
If you are stuck at any point and if this FAQ cannot help you, please drop us a
mail to the user mailing list: <simgrid-user@lists.gforge.inria.fr>.
\subsubsection faq_MIA_asynchronous I want to do asynchronous communications in MSG
-In the past (version <= 3.4), there was no function to perform asynchronous communications.
-It could easily be implemented by creating new process when needed though. Since version 3.5,
-we have introduced the following functions:
- - MSG_task_isend()
- - MSG_task_irecv()
- - MSG_comm_test()
- - MSG_comm_wait()
- - MSG_comm_waitall()
- - MSG_comm_waitany()
- - MSG_comm_destroy()
+You are probably looking for the following functions:
+MSG_task_isend() and MSG_task_irecv();
+MSG_comm_test(), MSG_comm_wait(), MSG_comm_waitall() and MSG_comm_waitany();
+MSG_comm_destroy().
-We refer you to the description of these functions for more details on their usage as well
-as to the example section on \ref MSG_ex_asynchronous_communications.
+There is even a specific example section on \ref msg_ex_asynchronous_communications.
\subsubsection faq_MIA_thread_synchronization I need to synchronize my MSG processes
\subsection faq_trouble_errors Runtime error messages
-\subsubsection faq_flexml_limit "surf_parse_lex: Assertion `next limit' failed."
-
-This is because your platform file is too big for the parser.
-
-Actually, the message comes directly from FleXML, the technology on top of
-which the parser is built. FleXML has the bad idea of fetching the whole
-document in memory before parsing it. And moreover, the memory buffer size
-must be determined at compilation time.
-
-We use a value which seems big enough for our need without bloating the
-simulators footprints. But of course your mileage may vary. In this case,
-just edit src/surf/surfxml.l modify the definition of
-FLEXML_BUFFERSTACKSIZE. E.g.
-
-\verbatim
-#define FLEXML_BUFFERSTACKSIZE 1000000000
-\endverbatim
-
-Then recompile and everything should be fine, provided that your version of
-Flex is recent enough (>= 2.5.31). If not the compilation process should
-warn you.
-
-A while ago, we worked on FleXML to reduce a bit its memory consumption, but
-these issues remain. There is two things we should do:
-
- - use a dynamic buffer instead of a static one so that the only limit
- becomes your memory, not a stupid constant fixed at compilation time
- (maybe not so difficult).
- - change the parser so that it does not need to get the whole file in
- memory before parsing
- (seems quite difficult, but I'm a complete newbe wrt flex stuff).
-
-These are changes to FleXML itself, not SimGrid. But since we kinda hijacked
-the development of FleXML, I can grant you that any patches would be really
-welcome and quickly integrated.
-
-<b>Update:</b> A new version of FleXML (1.7) was released. Most of the work
-was done by William Dowling, who use it in his own work. The good point is
-that it now use a dynamic buffer, and that the memory usage was greatly
-improved. The downside is that William also changed some things internally,
-and it breaks the hack we devised to bypass the parser, as explained in
-\ref pf_flexml_bypassing. Indeed, this is not a classical usage of the
-parser, and Will didn't imagine that we may have used (and even documented)
-such a crude usage of FleXML. So, we now have to repair the bypassing
-functionality to use the latest FleXML version and fix the memory usage in
-SimGrid.
-
\subsubsection faq_trouble_errors_big_fat_warning I'm told that my XML files are too old.
The format of the XML platform description files is sometimes
That is why the XML files are versionned using the 'version' attribute
of the root tag. Currently, it should read:
-\verbatim
- <platform version="2">
-\endverbatim
+@verbatim
+ <platform version="4">
+@endverbatim
If your files are too old, you can use the simgrid_update_xml.pl
script which can be found in the tools directory of the archive.
If you don't, you really should use valgrind to debug your code, it's
almost magic.
-\subsubsection faq_trouble_vg_longjmp longjmp madness in valgrind
-
-This is when valgrind starts complaining about longjmp things, just like:
-
-\verbatim ==21434== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
-==21434== at 0x420DBE5: longjmp (longjmp.c:33)
-==21434==
-==21434== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
-==21434== at 0x420DC3A: __longjmp (__longjmp.S:48)
-\endverbatim
-
-This is the sign that you didn't used the exception mechanism well. Most
-probably, you have a <tt>return;</tt> somewhere within a <tt>TRY{}</tt>
-block. This is <b>evil</b>, and you must not do this. Did you read the section
-about \ref XBT_ex??
-
\subsubsection faq_trouble_vg_libc Valgrind spits tons of errors about backtraces!
It may happen that valgrind, the memory debugger beloved by any decent C
on your side... We have plenty of FAQ entries to redact and new
features to implement for the impenitents! ;)
-Using
-
\subsection faq_surf_network_latency I get weird timings when I play with the latencies.
OK, first of all, remember that units should be Bytes, Flops and
