From fabde1ef6f5400b4d22fdf0c2d79e8ebe71db01b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mquinson Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:33:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] explain clearly when things go wrong just because we broke the backward compatibility git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/simgrid/simgrid/trunk@9294 48e7efb5-ca39-0410-a469-dd3cf9ba447f --- src/surf/surf_routing.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/surf/surf_routing.c b/src/surf/surf_routing.c index e675518f6f..4b4858ac1d 100644 --- a/src/surf/surf_routing.c +++ b/src/surf/surf_routing.c @@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static void model_full_set_route(routing_component_t rc, const char *src, (void*)TO_ROUTE_FULL(*src_id, *dst_id)->generic_route.link_list, (void*)link_route_to_test, (int_f_cpvoid_cpvoid_t) surf_pointer_resource_cmp), - "The route between \"%s\" and \"%s\" already exists", src,dst); + "The route between \"%s\" and \"%s\" already exists. If you are trying to define a reverse route, you must set the symmetrical=no attribute to your routes tags.", src,dst); xbt_dynar_free(&link_route_to_test); } else -- 2.20.1