From 4f5cd513b56a03f3f7fac50dd6ff033150acec6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@loria.fr>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:43:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] further improve that damn message (fct called from two user
 visible functions -> don't name them)

---
 src/msg/msg_mailbox.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/msg/msg_mailbox.c b/src/msg/msg_mailbox.c
index bedccad273..c45fd91eab 100644
--- a/src/msg/msg_mailbox.c
+++ b/src/msg/msg_mailbox.c
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ MSG_mailbox_get_task_ext(msg_mailbox_t mailbox, m_task_t * task,
   xbt_assert(task, "Null pointer for the task storage");
 
   if (*task)
-    XBT_CRITICAL
-        ("MSG_task_receive() was asked to write in a non empty task struct.");
+    XBT_WARN
+        ("Asked to write the received task in a non empty struct -- proceeding.");
 
   /* Try to receive it by calling SIMIX network layer */
   TRY {
-- 
2.20.1