From: Martin Quinson Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:39:18 +0000 (+0200) Subject: acknowledge that #120 can be seen here X-Git-Tag: v3.16~73 X-Git-Url: http://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gitweb/simgrid.git/commitdiff_plain/fe7b2f19130d74d3b6e7f2356b65a422fbd53b37 acknowledge that #120 can be seen here we will fix it at some point, but not today... --- diff --git a/teshsuite/msg/host_on_off_processes/host_on_off_processes.tesh b/teshsuite/msg/host_on_off_processes/host_on_off_processes.tesh index fb1fb12f5d..13b028d28b 100644 --- a/teshsuite/msg/host_on_off_processes/host_on_off_processes.tesh +++ b/teshsuite/msg/host_on_off_processes/host_on_off_processes.tesh @@ -91,3 +91,8 @@ $ ./host_on_off_processes ${srcdir:=.}/../../../examples/platforms/small_platfor > [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test 6 is also weird: when the node Jupiter is turned off once again, the VM and its daemon are not killed. However, the issue regarding the shutdown of hosted VMs can be seen a feature not a bug ;) > [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test done. See you! > [10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Simulation time 10 +> [10.000000] [surf_maxmin/WARNING] Probable bug: a simgrid::surf::CpuCas01Action variable (#13) not removed before the LMM system destruction. +> [10.000000] [surf_maxmin/WARNING] Probable bug: a simgrid::surf::CpuCas01Action variable (#2) not removed before the LMM system destruction. + +p The previous test suffers of bug https://github.com/simgrid/simgrid/issues/120 +p but the code is still not clean enough to really solve it.