From: Augustin Degomme Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:58:08 +0000 (+0100) Subject: avoid changing smpi process index to handle finalization, as this lead to problems X-Git-Tag: v3_11_beta~89 X-Git-Url: http://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gitweb/simgrid.git/commitdiff_plain/fce3a86dd4d407dad48652984bf5bf0444f37170?ds=sidebyside avoid changing smpi process index to handle finalization, as this lead to problems --- diff --git a/src/smpi/private.h b/src/smpi/private.h index 26847a61b4..d40078d6a6 100644 --- a/src/smpi/private.h +++ b/src/smpi/private.h @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ typedef struct s_smpi_process_data *smpi_process_data_t; #define ISEND 0x20 #define SSEND 0x40 #define PREPARED 0x80 + + +enum smpi_process_state{ + SMPI_UNINITIALIZED, + SMPI_INITIALIZED, + SMPI_FINALIZED +}; + // this struct is here to handle the problem of non-contignous data // for each such structure these function should be implemented (vector // index hvector hindex struct) diff --git a/src/smpi/smpi_global.c b/src/smpi/smpi_global.c index 47d5639a3d..1ce1c2be5d 100644 --- a/src/smpi/smpi_global.c +++ b/src/smpi/smpi_global.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ typedef struct s_smpi_process_data { MPI_Comm comm_self; void *data; /* user data */ int index; - int initialized; + char state; int sampling; /* inside an SMPI_SAMPLE_ block? */ } s_smpi_process_data_t; @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void smpi_process_init(int *argc, char ***argv) void smpi_process_destroy(void) { int index = smpi_process_index(); - process_data[index]->index = -100; + process_data[index]->state = SMPI_FINALIZED; XBT_DEBUG("<%d> Process left the game", index); } @@ -110,8 +110,11 @@ void smpi_process_finalize(void) */ int smpi_process_finalized() { - return (smpi_process_index() == -100); - // If finalized, this value has been set to -100; + int index = smpi_process_index(); + if (index != MPI_UNDEFINED) + return (process_data[index]->state == SMPI_FINALIZED); + else + return 0; } /** @@ -120,8 +123,8 @@ int smpi_process_finalized() int smpi_process_initialized(void) { int index = smpi_process_index(); - return ((index != -100) && (index != MPI_UNDEFINED) - && (process_data[index]->initialized)); + return ( (index != MPI_UNDEFINED) + && (process_data[index]->state == SMPI_INITIALIZED)); } /** @@ -130,8 +133,8 @@ int smpi_process_initialized(void) void smpi_process_mark_as_initialized(void) { int index = smpi_process_index(); - if ((index != -100) && (index != MPI_UNDEFINED)) - process_data[index]->initialized = 1; + if ((index != MPI_UNDEFINED) && (!process_data[index]->state != SMPI_FINALIZED)) + process_data[index]->state = SMPI_INITIALIZED; } @@ -321,7 +324,7 @@ void smpi_global_init(void) if (MC_is_active()) MC_ignore_heap(process_data[i]->timer, xbt_os_timer_size()); process_data[i]->comm_self = MPI_COMM_NULL; - process_data[i]->initialized = 0; + process_data[i]->state = SMPI_UNINITIALIZED; process_data[i]->sampling = 0; } group = smpi_group_new(process_count);