From: Christophe ThiƩry Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:04:28 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Fix remaining memory leaks in MSG X-Git-Tag: exp_20120216~558^2~9 X-Git-Url: http://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gitweb/simgrid.git/commitdiff_plain/82904dcc37f75453c571a1a74e67c1ba282ebe23?hp=e5922b4dce28002422ca9d68a4c44521f67c0f6f Fix remaining memory leaks in MSG --- diff --git a/src/msg/gos.c b/src/msg/gos.c index 4a09c655dd..cb6c929ae1 100644 --- a/src/msg/gos.c +++ b/src/msg/gos.c @@ -437,8 +437,8 @@ XBT_INLINE msg_comm_t MSG_task_isend_with_matching(m_task_t task, const char *al * \brief Sends a task on a mailbox. * * This is a non blocking detached send function. - * Think of it as a best effort send. The communication - * object will be destroyed by the receiver (if any). + * Think of it as a best effort send. The task should + * be destroyed by the receiver. * * \param task a #m_task_t to send on another location. * \param alias name of the mailbox to sent the task to @@ -623,9 +623,7 @@ void MSG_comm_destroy(msg_comm_t comm) (*comm->task_received)->simdata->isused = 0; } - /* FIXME auto-destroy comms from SIMIX to avoid this request */ - /*SIMIX_req_comm_destroy(comm->s_comm);*/ - free(comm); + xbt_free(comm); } /** \ingroup msg_gos_functions diff --git a/src/msg/task.c b/src/msg/task.c index 2a9a5c09d9..b0df136d09 100644 --- a/src/msg/task.c +++ b/src/msg/task.c @@ -159,25 +159,22 @@ MSG_error_t MSG_task_destroy(m_task_t task) smx_action_t action = NULL; xbt_assert((task != NULL), "Invalid parameter"); - /* why? if somebody is using, then you can't free! ok... but will return MSG_OK? when this task will be destroyed? isn't the user code wrong? */ - if (task->simdata->isused > 0) { - XBT_DEBUG("Cannot destroy task %p since somebody is using it", task); - return MSG_OK; + if (task->simdata->isused) { + /* the task is still being used, it may be an unfinished dsend */ + MSG_task_cancel(task); } #ifdef HAVE_TRACING TRACE_msg_task_destroy(task); #endif - if (task->name) - free(task->name); + xbt_free(task->name); action = task->simdata->compute; if (action) SIMIX_req_host_execution_destroy(action); /* parallel tasks only */ - if (task->simdata->host_list) - xbt_free(task->simdata->host_list); + xbt_free(task->simdata->host_list); /* free main structures */ xbt_free(task->simdata); @@ -201,6 +198,7 @@ MSG_error_t MSG_task_cancel(m_task_t task) } else if (task->simdata->comm) { SIMIX_req_comm_cancel(task->simdata->comm); + task->simdata->isused = 0; } else { static int warned = 0; diff --git a/src/simix/smx_network.c b/src/simix/smx_network.c index 3c4440ebef..68d36ae49a 100644 --- a/src/simix/smx_network.c +++ b/src/simix/smx_network.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ unsigned long int smx_total_comms = 0; static void SIMIX_waitany_req_remove_from_actions(smx_req_t req); static void SIMIX_comm_copy_data(smx_action_t comm); static smx_action_t SIMIX_comm_new(e_smx_comm_type_t type); +static void SIMIX_comm_remove_from_processes(smx_action_t action); static XBT_INLINE void SIMIX_rdv_push(smx_rdv_t rdv, smx_action_t comm); static XBT_INLINE void SIMIX_rdv_remove(smx_rdv_t rdv, smx_action_t comm); static smx_action_t SIMIX_rdv_get_request(smx_rdv_t rdv, e_smx_comm_type_t type, @@ -551,6 +552,8 @@ void SIMIX_comm_finish(smx_action_t action) unsigned int destroy_count = 0; smx_req_t req; + SIMIX_comm_remove_from_processes(action); + while ((req = xbt_fifo_shift(action->request_list))) { /* If a waitany request is waiting for this action to finish, then remove @@ -678,33 +681,46 @@ void SIMIX_post_comm(smx_action_t action) XBT_DEBUG("SIMIX_post_comm: comm %p, state %d, src_proc %p, dst_proc %p, detached: %d", action, action->state, action->comm.src_proc, action->comm.dst_proc, action->comm.detached); - /* remove the action from pending communications of both processes (if they still exist) */ + /* destroy the surf actions associated with the Simix communication */ + SIMIX_comm_destroy_internal_actions(action); + + /* if there are requests associated with the action, then answer them */ + if (xbt_fifo_size(action->request_list)) { + SIMIX_comm_finish(action); + } + else { + SIMIX_comm_remove_from_processes(action); + } +} + +/** + * \brief Removes a communication action from the list of pending communications + * of both processes (if they still exist) + * \param action a communication action + */ +static void SIMIX_comm_remove_from_processes(smx_action_t action) { + if (action->comm.src_proc) { xbt_fifo_remove(action->comm.src_proc->comms, action); } if (action->comm.dst_proc) { xbt_fifo_remove(action->comm.dst_proc->comms, action); } - - /* destroy the surf actions associated with the Simix communication */ - SIMIX_comm_destroy_internal_actions(action); - - /* if there are requests associated with the action, then answer them */ - if (xbt_fifo_size(action->request_list)) - SIMIX_comm_finish(action); } void SIMIX_comm_cancel(smx_action_t action) { - /* If the action is a waiting state means that it is still in a rdv */ + /* if the action is a waiting state means that it is still in a rdv */ /* so remove from it and delete it */ if (action->state == SIMIX_WAITING) { SIMIX_rdv_remove(action->comm.rdv, action); action->state = SIMIX_FAILED; - } else { - /* When running the MC there are no surf actions */ - if(!MC_IS_ENABLED) - surf_workstation_model->action_cancel(action->comm.surf_comm); + } + else if (!MC_IS_ENABLED + && (action->state == SIMIX_READY || action->state == SIMIX_RUNNING)) { + + /* when running the MC there are no surf actions */ + surf_workstation_model->action_cancel(action->comm.surf_comm); } }