Logo AND Algorithmique Numérique Distribuée

Public GIT Repository
The memory management of dirname is stupid, so be brutal
authorMartin Quinson <martin.quinson@loria.fr>
Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:24:15 +0000 (01:24 +0100)
committerMartin Quinson <martin.quinson@loria.fr>
Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:24:19 +0000 (01:24 +0100)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26111096/should-i-free-strdup-pointer-after-basename-dirname-in-c

src/xbt/xbt_os_file.c

index 0de1cd2..2dda1b2 100644 (file)
@@ -74,7 +74,10 @@ char *xbt_dirname(const char *path) {
     err = _splitpath_s(path, drive, _MAX_DRIVE, dir, _MAX_DIR, NULL,0, NULL,0);
     return bprintf("%s%s",drive,dir);
 #else
-    return dirname(xbt_strdup(path));
+    char *tmp = xbt_strdup(path);
+    char *res = xbt_strdup(dirname(tmp));
+    free(tmp);
+    return res;
 #endif
 }
 /** @brief Returns the file component of a path (reimplementation of POSIX basename)
@@ -89,6 +92,9 @@ char *xbt_basename(const char *path) {
     err = _splitpath_s(path, NULL,0, NULL,0, file,1024, ext,1024);
     return bprintf("%s.%s",file,ext);
 #else
-    return basename(xbt_strdup(path));
+    char *tmp = xbt_strdup(path);
+    char *res = xbt_strdup(basename(tmp));
+    free(tmp);
+    return res;
 #endif
 }