at_complete acc-pairtype manyget large-small-acc lock_dt win_dynamic_acc fetch_and_op flush req_example rmanull rmazero badrma
lock_nested winname attrorderwin baseattrwin fkeyvalwin strided_acc_indexed strided_getacc_indexed compare_and_swap
lockall_dt lockall_dt_flushall lock_dt_flush lockall_dt_flush lockall_dt_flushlocalall lockall_dt_flushlocal lock_dt_flushlocal
- strided_acc_onelock strided_get_indexed strided_putget_indexed contention_put contention_putget
+ strided_acc_onelock strided_get_indexed strided_putget_indexed contention_put contention_putget lockcontention3
adlb_mimic1 lock_contention_dt acc-loc get_acc_local get_accumulate put_base put_bottom
linked_list_bench_lock_all linked_list_bench_lock_excl manyrma2 pscw_ordering rma-contig get-struct
rput_local_comp racc_local_comp rget-testall win_shared win_shared_put_flush_get)
# fence_shm fetchandadd_am fetchandadd fetchandadd_tree_am fetchandadd_tree
# linked_list_bench_lock_shr linked_list linked_list_fop linked_list_lockall
- # mcs-mutex mixedsync mutex_bench lockcontention3 reqops
+ # mcs-mutex mixedsync mutex_bench reqops
# strided_getacc_indexed_shared rget-unlock
# win_flavors win_shared_zerobyte win_shared_noncontig win_shared_noncontig_put
# win_large_shm win_zero wintest atomic_rmw_fop atomic_rmw_gacc atomic_get atomic_rmw_cas
break;
case 3: /* Datatype single put (strided put) */
case 6: /* a few small puts (like strided put, but 1 word at a time) */
- /* FIXME: The conditional and increment are reversed below. This looks
- * like a bug, and currently prevents the following test from running. */
for (j = 0; j < veccount; j++) {
- if (buf[j * stride] != PUT_VAL + j) {
+ if (buf[j * stride+OFFSET_1] != PUT_VAL + j) {
errs++;
- printf("case %d: value is %d should be %d\n", i, buf[j * stride], PUT_VAL + j);
+ printf("case %d: value is %d should be %d\n", i, buf[j * stride+OFFSET_1], PUT_VAL + j);
}
}
break;
case 4: /* Datatype single accumulate (strided acc) */
case 7: /* a few small accumulates (like strided acc, but 1 word at a time) */
- /* FIXME: The conditional and increment are reversed below. This looks
- * like a bug, and currently prevents the following test from running. */
for (j = 0; j < veccount;j++) {
- if (buf[j * stride] != ACC_VAL + j + OFFSET_2 + j * stride) {
+ if (buf[j * stride+OFFSET_2] != ACC_VAL + j + OFFSET_2 + j * stride) {
errs++;
printf("case %d: value is %d should be %d\n", i,
- buf[j * stride], ACC_VAL + j + OFFSET_2 + j * stride);
+ buf[j * stride+OFFSET_2], ACC_VAL + j + OFFSET_2 + j * stride);
}
}
break;
