X-Git-Url: http://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gitweb/simgrid.git/blobdiff_plain/e8d0f23a1cdda93619b38596bebbdc0c58a05160..34b1612aaf4fb4375dc39f42941027e56b80aafa:/tools/simgrid.supp diff --git a/tools/simgrid.supp b/tools/simgrid.supp index 82cd7a8293..98a18e1575 100644 --- a/tools/simgrid.supp +++ b/tools/simgrid.supp @@ -15,23 +15,18 @@ obj:/usr/bin/* } -# There's a constant leak of 56 bytes in the depths of libc which -# manifests, for example, when using backtrace() { - Memory leak in libc/dlopen with -pthread + Memory leak in cmake Memcheck:Leak - fun:malloc - fun:_dl_map_object_deps - fun:dl_open_worker - fun:_dl_catch_error - fun:_dl_open - fun:do_dlopen - fun:_dl_catch_error - fun:dlerror_run - fun:__libc_dlopen_mode + match-leak-kinds:reachable + ... + fun:_ZN4Json5Value13nullSingletonEv + obj:*/libjsoncpp.so* + ... + fun:_dl_init } -# Another problem in glibc, where makecontext does not reset the EBP register, +# There's problem in glibc, where makecontext does not reset the EBP register, # and backtrace goes too far when walking up the stack frames { Invalid read in backtrace, called after makecontext @@ -51,6 +46,14 @@ fun:_dl_start } +# There are memory leaks when using dlopen +{ + Memory leak in libc/dlopen + Memcheck:Leak + ... + fun:_dlerror_run +} + # 72704 bytes leak from GCC >5.1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535 { Memory leak in dl_init @@ -63,6 +66,17 @@ fun:_dl_init } +{ + Leaks in test-help-version and test-help-logs (early call to exit()) + Memcheck:Leak + match-leak-kinds: reachable + fun:_Znwm + fun:_ZN7simgrid3s4u6EngineC1EPiPPc + fun:main + ... + obj:*/basic-parsing-test +} + #Ignore leaks in SMPI sample codes { Leaks in SMPI sample codes @@ -72,7 +86,16 @@ fun:smpi_simulated_main_ } -# Memory leaks appearing to be in libcgraph. They can be seen with the +#This test has an intentional leak +{ + Intentional leak in SMPI sample codes + Memcheck:Leak + match-leak-kinds: all + fun:MPI_Comm_dup + obj:coll-allreduce-with-leaks* +} + +#Memory leaks appearing to be in libcgraph. They can be seen with the # following simple program: # ,---- # | #include @@ -92,43 +115,34 @@ # | } # `---- { - Memory leak in libcgraph (1/2) + Memory leak in libcgraph (1/3) Memcheck:Leak fun:malloc ... - obj:/usr/lib/libcgraph.so* fun:aaglex fun:aagparse fun:agconcat } { - Memory leak in libcgraph (1/2) + Memory leak in libcgraph (2/3) Memcheck:Leak fun:calloc ... - obj:/usr/lib/libcgraph.so* + obj:*/libcgraph.so* fun:aagparse fun:agconcat } { - Memory leak in libcgraph (2/2) + Memory leak in libcgraph (3/3) Memcheck:Leak fun:malloc ... fun:agnode - obj:/usr/lib/libcgraph.so* + obj:*/libcgraph.so* fun:aagparse fun:agconcat } -# We're not interested by memory leaks in the Lua interpreter -{ - Memory leak in lua - Memcheck:Leak - ... - fun:luaD_precall -} - # libunwind seems to be using msync poorly, thus triggering these # https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/4533 { @@ -139,3 +153,56 @@ obj:*/libpthread*.so ... } + +{ + ignore unwind cruft + Memcheck:Param + rt_sigprocmask(set) + ... + obj:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind.so.* + ... +} +{ + ignore unwind cruft + Memcheck:Param + msync(start) + ... + obj:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind.so.* + ... +} +{ + ignore unwind cruft + Memcheck:Param + write(buf) + ... + fun:_ULx86_64_step + obj:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind.so.* +} + +{ + ignore unwind invalid reads + Memcheck:Addr8 + fun:_Ux86_64_setcontext +} + +# Ignore python cruft +{ + ignore python cruft 1 + Memcheck:Cond + ... + obj:/usr/bin/python* +} + +{ + ignore python cruft 2 + Memcheck:Addr4 + ... + obj:/usr/bin/python* +} + +{ + ignore python cruft 3 + Memcheck:Value8 + ... + obj:/usr/bin/python* +}