X-Git-Url: http://info.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gitweb/simgrid.git/blobdiff_plain/368914fb8daebc6d2d2cd58ab4645974b14216c2..501196fba8269024636b011851ce7ea63d7696c9:/docs/source/platform.rst diff --git a/docs/source/platform.rst b/docs/source/platform.rst index 4a9f3f9f2d..1909927daf 100644 --- a/docs/source/platform.rst +++ b/docs/source/platform.rst @@ -35,19 +35,77 @@ Finally, you may also describe an **experimental scenario**, with qualitative (e an external load) and qualitative (e.g., representing how some elements fail and restart over time) changes. -Defining Basic Elements -*********************** +First Example +************* -These are the components of your platform. +Imagine you want to describe a little platform with three hosts, +interconnected as follows: +.. image:: /tuto_smpi/3hosts.png + :align: center + +This can be done with the following platform file, that considers the +simulated platform as a graph of hosts and network links. + +.. literalinclude:: /tuto_smpi/3hosts.xml + :language: xml + +The most important elements are the basic ones: :ref:`pf_tag_host`, +:ref:`pf_tag_link`, and similar. Then come the routes between any pair +of hosts, that are given explicitely with :ref:`pf_tag_route` (routes +are symmetrical by default). Any host must be given a computational +speed (in flops) while links must be given a latency (in seconds) and +a bandwidth (in bytes per second). Note that you can write 1Gflops +instead of 1000000000flops, and similar. + +Every platform element must be located within a given **networking +zone** . Zones are in +charge of the routing, see below. + +The last thing you must know on SimGrid platform files is that the +root tag must be :ref:`pf_tag_platform`. If the ``version`` attribute +does not match what SimGrid expects, you will be hinted to use to the +``simgrid_update_xml`` utility to update your file. -There is not much to say about the definition of basic elements. Just -use the appropriate tags: :ref:`pf_tag_host`, :ref:`pf_tag_link` and -:ref:`pf_tag_storage`. Defining a Routing ****************** +Networking zones (:ref:`pf_tag_zone`) are used to factorize the description +to reduce the size of your platform on disk and in memory. Then, when +a host wants to communicate with another host belonging to the same +zone, it is the zone's duty to find the list of links that are +involved in the communication. In the above example, since we use +``routing="Full"``, all routes must be explicitly given using the +:ref:`pf_tag_route` and :ref:`pf_tag_link_ctn` tags (this :ref:`routing +model ` is both simple and inefficient :) It is OK to not +specify each and every route between hosts, as long as you do not try +to start a communication on any of the missing routes during your +simulation. + +Any zone may contain sub-zones, allowing for a hierarchical +decomposition of the platform. Routing can be made more efficient (as the +inter-zone routing gets factored with :ref:`pf_tag_zoneroute`), and +allows you to have more than one routing model in your platform. For +example, you can have a coordinate-based routing for the WAN parts +of your platforms, a full routing within each datacenter, and a highly +optimized routing within each cluster of the datacenter. In this +case, determining the route between two given hosts gets :ref:`routing_basics` +"somewhat more complex" but SimGrid still computes +these routes for you in a time- and space-efficient manner. +Here is an illustration of these concepts: + +.. image:: img/zone_hierarchy.png + +Circles represent processing units and squares represent network +routers. Bold lines represent communication links. The zone "AS2" models the core of a national network interconnecting a +small flat cluster (AS4) and a larger hierarchical cluster (AS5), a +subset of a LAN (AS6), and a set of peers scattered around the world +(AS7). + +.. todo:: Add more examples, such as the cloud example described in + previous paragraph + Performance Profiles and Churn ******************************