> [Jupiter:commTX:(3) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Start TX
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] number of processes: 3
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Turn Jupiter off
-> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test 4 seems ok (number of Process : 2, it should be 1 or 2 if RX has not been satisfied) cool, you can now turn off a node that has a process paused by a sleep call
+> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test 4 is ok. (number of Process : 2, it should be 1 or 2 if RX has not been satisfied). An exception is raised when we turn off a node that has a process sleeping
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test done. See you!
+> [Jupiter:commTX:(3) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] The host has died ... as expected.
+> [Jupiter:commTX:(3) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] TX done
> [Tremblay:commRX:(2) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Receive message: TRANSFERT_FAILURE
> [Tremblay:commRX:(2) 20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] RX Done
> [20.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Simulation time 20
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Turn Jupiter off
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Shutdown vm0
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Destroy vm0
-> [10.000000] [surf_vm/WARNING] Dirty page tracking: 1 pending task(s) on a destroyed VM (first one is (name hidden)).
-> If you don't understand why your task was not properly removed, please report that bug.
-> This is a known bug if you turned the host off during the VM execution.
-> Please remind us of that problem at some point: our code base is not ready to fix this harmless issue in 2016, sorry.
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test 6 is also weird: when the node Jupiter is turned off once again, the VM and its daemon are not killed. However, the issue regarding the shutdown of hosted VMs can be seen a feature not a bug ;)
> [Tremblay:test_launcher:(1) 10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Test done. See you!
> [10.000000] [msg_test/INFO] Simulation time 10
-> [10.000000] [surf_maxmin/WARNING] Probable bug: a simgrid::surf::CpuCas01Action variable (#13) not removed before the LMM system destruction.
-> [10.000000] [surf_maxmin/WARNING] Probable bug: a simgrid::surf::CpuCas01Action variable (#2) not removed before the LMM system destruction.
-
-p The previous test suffers of bug https://github.com/simgrid/simgrid/issues/120
-p but the code is still not clean enough to really solve it.