2 @page community The SimGrid Community
6 SimGrid is a free software, written by a community of people. It
7 started as a little software to help ourselves in our own research,
8 and as more people put their input into the pot, it turned into
9 something that we hope to be valuable to many people. So yes. We hope
10 that SimGrid is helping you doing what you want, and that you will
11 join our community of happy simgriders.
13 @section community_contact Contacting the community
15 There are several locations where you can connect and discuss about
16 SimGrid. If you have a question, please have a look at the
17 documentation and examples first, but if some remain don't hesitate to
18 ask the community for help. If you do not have a question, just come to us
19 and say hello! We love earing about how people use SimGrid.
21 - For questions or remarks, drop us an email on the
22 <a href="mailto:simgrid-user@lists.gforge.inria.fr">User Mailing list</a> (to subscribe, visit the [webinterface](http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/simgrid-user));
23 you can also check out [our archives](http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/simgrid-user/).
24 We prefer you to <b>not use private emails</b>. SimGrid is an open
25 framework, and you never know who have the time and knowledge to
26 answer your question, so please keep messages on the public mailing list.
27 - Join us on IRC and ask your question directly on the channel \#simgrid at
28 \b irc.debian.org. Be warned that even if many people are connected to
29 the chanel, they may not be staring at their IRC windows.
30 So don't be surprised if you don't get an answer in the
31 second, and turn to the mailing lists if nobody seems to be there.
32 - Asking your question on [StackOverflow](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/simgrid) is also a good idea, as this
33 site is very well indexed. We answer questions there too (don't
34 forget to use the SimGrid tag in your question so that we can see
35 it), and they remain usable for the next users.
37 @section community_giveback Giving back to SimGrid
39 We are sometimes asked by users how to give back to the project. Here
40 are some ideas, but if you have new ones, feel free to share them with us.
42 @subsection contributing_spread Spread the word
44 There are many ways to help the SimGrid project. The first and most
45 natural one is to <b>use it for your research, and say so</b>. Cite
46 the SimGrid framework in your papers and discuss of its advantages with
47 your colleagues to spread the word. When we ask for new fundings to
48 sustain the project, the amount of publications enabled by SimGrid is
49 always the first question we get. The more you use the framework,
52 Make sure that your scientific publications using SimGrid actually
53 cite the <a href="http://simgrid.gforge.inria.fr/Publications.html">right paper</a>.
54 Also make sure that these citations are correctly listed on
55 <a href="http://simgrid.gforge.inria.fr/Usages.html">our list</a>.
57 You can also <b>help us constituting an active and welcoming user
58 community</b>. Subscribe to the mailing lists, and answer the
59 questions that newscomers have if you can. Point them (gently ;) to
60 the relevant part of the documentation on need, and help them becoming
61 part of our community too.
63 Another easy way to help the project is to add a link to the <a
64 href="http://simgrid.gforge.inria.fr">SimGrid homepage</a> on your
65 site to <b>improve SimGrid's ranking in search engines</b>.
67 Finally, if you organize a scientific event where you expect many
68 potential users, <b>you can invite us to give a tutorial on SimGrid</b>. We
69 found that 45 minutes to one hour is very sharp, but doable. It
70 allows us to explain the main motivations and outcomes of the project in
71 order to motivate the attendees get more information on SimGrid, and
72 eventually improve their scientific habits by using a sound simulation
74 <a href="http://webloria.loria.fr/~quinson/blog/2012/1120/Simgrid_at_Louvain/">Here</a>
75 is an example of such a presentation.
77 @subsection contributing_bugs Reporting (and fixing) any issue you find
79 Because of its size and complexity, SimGrid is not perfect and
80 contains a large amount of glitches and issues. When you find one,
81 don't assume that it's here because we don't care. It survived only
82 because nobody told us. We unfortunately cannot endlessly review our
83 large code and documentation base. So please, <b>report any issue you
84 find</b>, be it a typo in the documentation, a paragraph that needs to
85 be reworded, a bug in the code, or any other problem. The best way to
86 do so is to open an issue on our GitHub's
87 <a href="https://github.com/simgrid/simgrid/issues">Bug Tracker</a> so
88 that we don't forget about it (if you want to put some attachment, you
90 <a https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/?atid=165&group_id=12&func=browse">this
91 other bugtracker</a> instead).
93 The worst way to report such issues is to go through private emails.
94 These are unreliable, and we are trying to develop SimGrid openly, so
95 private discussions are to be avoided if possible.
97 If you can provide a patch fixing the issue you report, that's even
98 better. If you cannot, then you need to give us a minimal working
99 example (MWE), that is a ready to use solution that reproduces the
100 problem you face. Your bug will take much more time
101 for us to reproduce and fix if you don't give us the MWE, so you want
102 to help us helping you to get things efficient.
104 Of course, a very good way to give back to the SimGrid community is to
105 <b>triage and fix the bugs in the Bug Tracking Systems</b>. If you
106 can come up with a patch fixing them, we will be more than happy to
107 apply your changes so that the whole community enjoys them.
109 @section community_extend Extending SimGrid and its Ecosystem
111 @subsection contributing_contrib Contributing features and associated tools
113 If you deeply miss a feature in the framework, you should consider
114 implementing it yourself. SimGrid is free software, meaning that you are
115 free to help yourself. Of course, we'll do our best to assist you in
116 this task, so don't hesitate to contact us with your idea.
118 You could write a new plugin extending SimGrid in some way, or a
119 routing model for another kind of network. But even if you write your own
120 platform file, this is probably interesting to other users too, and
121 could be included to SimGrid. Modeling accurately a given platform is
122 a difficult work, which outcome is very precious to us.
124 Or maybe you developed an independent tool on top of SimGrid. We'd
125 love helping you gaining visibility by listing it in our
126 <a href="http://simgrid.gforge.inria.fr/contrib.html">Contrib
129 @subsection contributing_todo Possible Enhancements
131 If you want to start working on the SimGrid codebase, here are a few
132 ideas of things that could be done to improve the current code (not all of them
133 are difficult, do trust yourself ;)
135 @subsubsection contributing_todo_cxxification Migration to C++
137 The code is being migrated to C++ but a large part is still C (or C++ with
138 C idioms). It would be valuable to replace C idioms with C++ ones:
140 - replace XBT structures and C dynamic arrays with C++ containers;
142 - replace `char*` strings with `std::string`;
144 - use exception-safe RAII (`std::unique_ptr`, etc.) instead of explicit
145 `malloc/free` or `new/delete`;
147 - use `std::function` (or template functionoid arguments) instead of function
152 SimGrid used to implement exceptions in C. This has been replaced with C++
153 exceptions but some bits of the C exceptions are still remaining:
155 - `xbt_ex` was the type of C exceptions. It is now a standard C++ exception.
156 We might want to remove this exception and use a more idiomatic C++
157 solution with dedicated exception classes for different errors.
158 `std::system_error` might be used as well by replacing some `xbt_errcat_t`
159 with custom subclasses of `std::error_category`.
161 - The C API currently throws exceptions. Throwing exceptions out of a C API is
162 not very friendly. C code does not expect them, cannot catch them and cannot
163 handle resource management properly in face of exceptions. We should clearly
164 separate the C++ API and the C API and catch all exceptions before they get
167 #### Time and duration
169 Some support for C++11-style time/duration is implemented (see `chrono.hpp`)
170 but only available in some (S4U) APIs. It would be nice to add support for
171 them in the rest of the C++ code.
173 A related change would be to avoid using "-1" to mean "forever" at least in S4U
174 and in the internal code. For compatibility, MSG should probably keep this
175 semantic. We should probably always use separate functions
176 (`wait` vs `wait_for`).
178 #### Futures and Promises
180 - Some features are missing in the Maestro future implementation
181 (`simgrid::kernel::Future`, `simgrid::kernel::Promise`)
182 could be extended to support additional features:
183 `when_any`, `shared_future`, etc.
185 - The corresponding feature might then be implemented in the user process
186 futures (`simgrid::simix::Future`).
188 - Currently `.then()` is not available for user futures. We would need to add
189 a basic user event loop in order to queue the pending continuations.
191 - We might need to provide an option to cancel a pending operation. This
192 might be achieved by defining some `Action` or `Operation` class with an
193 API compatible with `Future` (and convertible to it) but with an
194 additional `.cancel()` method.
196 @subsubsection contributing_todo_smpi SMPI
198 #### Process-based privatization
200 Currently, all the simulated processes live in the same process as the SimGrid
201 simulator. The benefit is that we don't have to do context switches and IPC
202 between the simulator and the processes.
204 The fact that they share the same address space means that one memory corruption
205 in one simulated process can propagate to the other ones and to the SimGrid
208 Moreover, the current design for SMPI applications is to compile the MPI code
209 normally and execute it once per simulated process in the same system process:
210 This means that all the existing simulated MPI processes share the same virtual
211 address space and share by default the same global variables. This is not
212 correct as each MPI process is expected to use its own address space and have
213 its own global variables. In order to fix, this problem we have an optional
214 SMPI privatization feature which creates an instanciation of the executable
215 data segment per MPI process and map the correct one (using `mmap`) at each
218 This approach has many problems:
220 1. It is not completely safe. We only handle SMPI privatization for the global
221 variables in the execute data segment. Shared objects are ignored but some
222 may contain global variables which may need to be privatized:
224 - libsimgrid for example must not be privatized because it contains
225 shared state for the simulator;
227 - libc must not be privatized for the same reason (but some global variables
228 in the libc may not be privatized);
230 - if we use global variables of some shared object in the executable, this
231 global variable will be instanciated in the executable (because of copy
232 relocation) and will be privatized even if it shoud not.
234 2. We cannot execute the MPI processes in parallel. Only one can execute at
235 the same time because only one privatization segment can be mapped at a
238 In order to fix this, the standard solution is to move each MPI process in its
239 own system process and use IPC to communicate with the simulator. One concern would
240 be the impact on performance and memory consumption:
242 - It would introduce a lot of context switches and IPC communications between
243 the MPI processes and the SimGrid simulator. However, currently every context
244 switch needs a `mmap` for SMPI privatization which is costly as well
247 - Instanciating a lot of processes might consume more memory which might be a
248 problem if we want to simulate a lot of MPI processes. Compiling MPI programs
249 as static executables with a lightweight libc might help and we might want to
250 support that. The SMPI processes should probably not embed all the SimGrid
251 simulator and its dependencies, the C++ runtime, etc.
253 We would need to modify the model-checker as well which currently can only
254 manage on model-checked process. For the model-checker we can expect some
255 benefits from this approach: if a process did not execute, we know its state
256 did not change and we don't need to take its snapshot and compare its state.
258 Other solutions for this might include:
260 - Mapping each MPI process in the process of the simulator but in a different
261 symbol namespace (see `dlmopen`). Each process would have its own separate
262 instanciation and would not share libraries.
264 - Instanciate each MPI process in a separate lightweight VM (for example based
265 on WebAssembly) in the simualtor process.
267 @subsubsection contributing_todo_mc Model-checker
269 #### Overhaul the state comparison code
271 The state comparison code is quite complicated. It has very long functions and
272 is programmed mostly using C idioms and is difficult to understand and debug.
273 It is in need of an overhaul:
275 - cleanup, refactoring, usage of C++ features.
277 - The state comparison code works by infering types of blocks allocated on the
278 heap by following pointers from known roots (global variables, local
279 variables). Usually the first type found for a given block is used even if
280 a better one could be found later. By using a first pass of type inference,
281 on each snapshot before comparing the states, we might use a better type
282 information on the different blocks.
284 - We might benefit from adding logic for handling some known types. For
285 example, both `std::string` and `std::vector` have a capacity which might
286 be larger than the current size of the container. We should ignore
287 the corresponding elements when comparing the states and infering the types.
289 - Another difficulty in the state comparison code is the detection of
290 dangling pointers. We cannot easily know if a pointer is dangling and
291 dangling pointers might lead us to choose the wrong type when infering
292 heap blocks. We might mitigate this problem by delaying the reallocation of
293 a freed block until there is no blocks pointing to it anymore using some
294 sort of basic garbage-collector.
296 #### Hashing the states
298 In order to speed up the state comparison an idea was to create a hash of the
299 state. Only states with the same hash would need to be compared using the
300 state comparison algorithm. Some information should not be inclueded in the
301 hash in order to avoid considering different states which would otherwise
302 would have been considered equal.
304 The states could be indexed by their hash. Currently they are indexed
305 by the number of processes and the amount of heap currently allocated
306 (see `DerefAndCompareByNbProcessesAndUsedHeap`).
308 Good candidate informations for the state hashing:
310 - number of processes;
312 - their backtraces (instruction addresses);
314 - their current simcall numbers;
316 - some simcall arguments (eg. number of elements in a waitany);
318 - number of pending communications;
322 Some basic infrastructure for this is already in the code (see `mc_hash.cpp`)
323 but it is currently disabled.
325 #### Separate the model-checker code from libsimgrid
327 #### Interface with the model-checked processes
329 The model-checker reads many information about the model-checked process
330 by `process_vm_readv()`-ing brutally the data structure of the model-checked
331 process leading to some horrible code such as walking a swag from another
332 process. It prevents us as well from replacing some XBT data structures with
333 standard C++ ones. We need a sane way to expose the relevant information to
336 #### Generic simcalls
338 We have introduced some generic simcalls which can be used to execute a
339 callback in SimGrid Maestro context. It makes it a lot easier to interface
340 the simulated process with the maestro. However, the callbacks for the
341 model-checker which cannot decide how it should handle them. We would need a
342 solution for this if we want to be able to replace the simcalls the
343 model-checker cares about by generic simcalls.
345 #### Defining an API for writing Model-Checking algorithms
347 Currently, writing a new model-checking algorithms in SimGridMC is quite
348 difficult: the logic of the model-checking algorithm is mixed with a lot of
349 low-level concerns about the way the model-checker is implemented. This makes it
350 difficult to write new algorithms and difficult to understand, debug, and modify
351 the existing ones. We need a clean API to express the model-checking algorithms
352 in a form which is closer to the text-book/paper description. This API must
353 be exposed in a a language which is more adequate to this task.
357 1. Design and implement a clean API to express model-checking algorithms.
358 A `Session` class currently exists for this but is not feature complete
359 and should probably be rewritten. It should be easy to create bindings
360 for different languages on top of this API.
362 2. Create a binding to some better suited, dynamic, scripting language
365 3. Rewrite the existing model-checking algorithms in this language using the